Transparency alternatives to Elli
Other EV charging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Elli. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Elli on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Elli has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Elli” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Elli | Found at Elli, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driivzdriivz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Driivz | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Chargepointchargepoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chargepoint | 32/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Reevreev.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reev | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Easeeeasee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easee | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Virtavirta.globalSee also Transparency alternatives to Virta | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Hubjecthubject.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubject | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Plugsurfingplugsurfing.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plugsurfing | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Zapteczaptec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zaptec | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Zeplugzeplug.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zeplug | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Chargepricechargeprice.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Chargeprice | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Go-ego-e.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Go-e | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Montamonta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Monta | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.