SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Go-e

Other EV charging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Go-e does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Go-e on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Go-e has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Go-e does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Go-e does notGo-e publishes, and they do not
Chargepointchargepoint.com 32/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Driivzdriivz.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Hubjecthubject.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Reevreev.com 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Easeeeasee.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Virtavirta.global 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Atlanteatlante.energy 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Chargecloudchargecloud.de 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Ellielli.eco 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Etreletrel.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Montamonta.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Mennekesmennekes.de 15/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.