Transparency alternatives to Go-e
Other EV charging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Go-e. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Go-e on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Go-e has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Go-e” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Go-e | Found at Go-e, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chargepointchargepoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chargepoint | 32/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Driivzdriivz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Driivz | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Reevreev.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reev | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Easeeeasee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easee | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Virtavirta.globalSee also Transparency alternatives to Virta | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Hubjecthubject.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubject | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Plugsurfingplugsurfing.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plugsurfing | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Zapteczaptec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zaptec | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Zeplugzeplug.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zeplug | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Ellielli.ecoSee also Transparency alternatives to Elli | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Chargepricechargeprice.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Chargeprice | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Montamonta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Monta | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.