SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Driivz

Other EV charging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Driivz. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Driivz on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Driivz has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Driivz” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at DriivzFound at Driivz, not found there
Chargepointchargepoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chargepoint 32/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Easeeeasee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easee 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Reevreev.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reev 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Virtavirta.globalSee also Transparency alternatives to Virta 26/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Hubjecthubject.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubject 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Plugsurfingplugsurfing.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plugsurfing 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Zapteczaptec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zaptec 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Zeplugzeplug.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zeplug 22/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Ellielli.ecoSee also Transparency alternatives to Elli 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Chargepricechargeprice.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Chargeprice 17/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Go-ego-e.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Go-e 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Montamonta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Monta 17/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.