SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Driivz

Other EV charging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Driivz does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Driivz on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Driivz has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Driivz does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Driivz does notDriivz publishes, and they do not
Hubjecthubject.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Chargepointchargepoint.com 32/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Easeeeasee.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Reevreev.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Atlanteatlante.energy 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Virtavirta.global 26/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Chargecloudchargecloud.de 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Ellielli.eco 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Etreletrel.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Mennekesmennekes.de 15/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Go-ego-e.com 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Montamonta.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.