SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Fourwaves

Other Event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Fourwaves. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 49 that differ from Fourwaves on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Fourwaves has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Fourwaves” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at FourwavesFound at Fourwaves, not found there
Stovastova.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Stova 78/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Mentimetermentimeter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mentimeter 65/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Bizzabobizzabo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzabo 61/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Crowdcastcrowdcast.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Crowdcast 57/100 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
Slidoslido.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Slido 48/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
EventWorksgeteventworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EventWorks 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Eventzillaeventzilla.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Eventzilla 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Schedsched.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sched 43/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
Zuddlzuddl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zuddl 43/100 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
SpeechWirespeechwire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SpeechWire 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
vFairsvfairs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to vFairs 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Acceleventsaccelevents.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accelevents 39/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data processing agreement Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.