Transparency alternatives to InScope-AML
Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that InScope-AML does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from InScope-AML on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
InScope-AML has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and InScope-AML does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and InScope-AML does not | InScope-AML publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXL Visionpxl-vision.com | 43/100 | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Feedzaifeedzai.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Socuresocure.com | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Sumsubsumsub.com | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sardinesardine.ai | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Incodeincode.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Truliootrulioo.com | 26/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Alloyalloy.com | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| IDnowidnow.io | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Signifydsignifyd.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Veriffveriff.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Yotiyoti.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.