Transparency alternatives to Fidelity Private Shares
Other Fund administration and private markets vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Fidelity Private Shares. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Fidelity Private Shares on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fidelity Private Shares has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Fidelity Private Shares” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Fidelity Private Shares | Found at Fidelity Private Shares, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affinityaffinity.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Affinity | 70/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Standard Metricsstandardmetrics.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Standard Metrics | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Intappintapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intapp | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Visiblevisible.vcSee also Transparency alternatives to Visible | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Juniper Squarejunipersquare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Juniper Square | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Fundwavefundwave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fundwave | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Runditrundit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rundit | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Anduinanduintransact.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anduin | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Chronographchronograph.peSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronograph | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Passthroughpassthrough.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Passthrough | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Vestlanevestlane.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vestlane | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Allvueallvuesystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Allvue | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.