SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Allvue

Other Fund administration and private markets vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Allvue. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Allvue on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Allvue has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Allvue” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at AllvueFound at Allvue, not found there
Affinityaffinity.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Affinity 70/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Intappintapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intapp 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Standard Metricsstandardmetrics.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Standard Metrics 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Visiblevisible.vcSee also Transparency alternatives to Visible 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Juniper Squarejunipersquare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Juniper Square 48/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Passthroughpassthrough.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Passthrough 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Runditrundit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rundit 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Anduinanduintransact.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anduin 35/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Eddaedda.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Edda 30/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Fundwavefundwave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fundwave 39/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Chronographchronograph.peSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronograph 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
4Degrees4degrees.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to 4Degrees 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.