Alternatives to Alteryx Spatial
Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Alteryx Spatial does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Alteryx Spatial on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Alteryx Spatial has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Alteryx Spatial does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Alteryx Spatial does not | Alteryx Spatial publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mapboxmapbox.com | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Bentley Systemsbentley.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| GIS Cloudgiscloud.com | 55/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Safe Software FMEsafe.com | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| LightBoxlightboxre.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Nearmapnearmap.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Foursquarefoursquare.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Geoapifygeoapify.com | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Koordinateskoordinates.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Ascent Cloudascentcloud.io | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Atlasatlas.co | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CARTOcarto.com | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.