SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Mapbox

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Mapbox does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Mapbox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Mapbox has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Mapbox does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Mapbox does notMapbox publishes, and they do not
GIS Cloudgiscloud.com 55/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.com 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.com 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
LightBoxlightboxre.com 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 Compare
Alteryx Spatialalteryx.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare
Geoapifygeoapify.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +4 Compare
Geocortexvertigis.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 Compare
Ascent Cloudascentcloud.io 35/100 1 Data location stated 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare
Atlasatlas.co 35/100 1 Data location stated 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
eSpatialespatial.com 35/100 1 Data location stated 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare
Nearmapnearmap.com 35/100 1 Data location stated 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
CARTOcarto.com 30/100 1 Data location stated 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.