SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to MetaLocator

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that MetaLocator does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 53 that differ from MetaLocator on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

MetaLocator has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and MetaLocator does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and MetaLocator does notMetaLocator publishes, and they do not
Mapboxmapbox.com 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Planetplanet.com 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.com 52/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.com 43/100 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
GIS Cloudgiscloud.com 55/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Pointlypointly.ai 39/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
eSpatialespatial.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Skyfiskyfi.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
CARTOcarto.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Feltfelt.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Geocortexvertigis.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Alteryx Spatialalteryx.com 26/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.