SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to CARTO

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CARTO does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from CARTO on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CARTO has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and CARTO does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and CARTO does notCARTO publishes, and they do not
Mapboxmapbox.com 61/100 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
GIS Cloudgiscloud.com 55/100 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
LightBoxlightboxre.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Alteryx Spatialalteryx.com 39/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Geoapifygeoapify.com 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Maptilermaptiler.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Atlasatlas.co 35/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
eSpatialespatial.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Feltfelt.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Foursquarefoursquare.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.