SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to LightBox

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that LightBox does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from LightBox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

LightBox has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and LightBox does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and LightBox does notLightBox publishes, and they do not
Mapboxmapbox.com 61/100 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare
GIS Cloudgiscloud.com 55/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.com 52/100 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.com 52/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Alteryx Spatialalteryx.com 39/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Foursquarefoursquare.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare
Maptilermaptiler.com 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare
Ascent Cloudascentcloud.io 35/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Atlasatlas.co 35/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
eSpatialespatial.com 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Nearmapnearmap.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Feltfelt.com 30/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.