SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to LightBox

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at LightBox. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 52 that differ from LightBox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

LightBox has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at LightBox” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at LightBoxFound at LightBox, not found there
Mapboxmapbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mapbox 61/100 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bentley Systems 43/100 5 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
GIS Cloudgiscloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GIS Cloud 55/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Safe Software FME 52/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Planetplanet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planet 48/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare
Feltfelt.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Felt 39/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Pointlypointly.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Pointly 39/100 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Foursquarefoursquare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foursquare 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare
Alteryx Spatialalteryx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alteryx Spatial 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare
Maptilermaptiler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Maptiler 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare
UP42up42.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UP42 38/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
CARTOcarto.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CARTO 35/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.