Alternatives to Maptiler
Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Maptiler does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Maptiler on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Maptiler has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Maptiler does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Maptiler does not | Maptiler publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mapboxmapbox.com | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Bentley Systemsbentley.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| GIS Cloudgiscloud.com | 55/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Safe Software FMEsafe.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| LightBoxlightboxre.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Nearmapnearmap.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Ascent Cloudascentcloud.io | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Atlasatlas.co | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CARTOcarto.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Feltfelt.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Foursquarefoursquare.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Geoapifygeoapify.com | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.