SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Intelligent Golf

Other Golf club management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Intelligent Golf does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from Intelligent Golf on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Intelligent Golf has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Intelligent Golf does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Intelligent Golf does notIntelligent Golf publishes, and they do not
Golf Geniusgolfgenius.com 50/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Golfmanagergolfmanager.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Teesnapteesnap.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Golfsoftwaregolfsoftware.com 35/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
HowDidiDohowdidido.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Club Systemsclubsystems.com 18/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Chronogolfchronogolf.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Jonas Clubjonasclub.com 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Toptracertoptracer.com 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Northstar Clubglobalnorthstar.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Clubspeedclubspeed.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Gallus Golfgallusgolf.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.