Alternatives to ProudCity
Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ProudCity does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from ProudCity on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ProudCity has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ProudCity does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ProudCity does not | ProudCity publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submittablesubmittable.com | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| OpenGovopengov.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fluxxfluxx.io | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Foundantfoundant.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Accelaaccela.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Mark43mark43.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Rekorrekor.ai | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Granicusgranicus.com | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Axonaxon.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Polcopolco.us | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Tyler Technologiestylertech.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Zencityzencity.io | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.