Transparency alternatives to Submittable
Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Submittable. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 61 that differ from Submittable on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Submittable has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Submittable” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Submittable | Found at Submittable, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenGovopengov.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenGov | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ProudCityproudcity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProudCity | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Accelaaccela.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accela | 57/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Fluxxfluxx.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Fluxx | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Foundantfoundant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foundant | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Rekorrekor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rekor | 39/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| ARMSarms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ARMS | 17/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| ClearGovcleargov.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClearGov | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Euna Solutionseunasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Euna Solutions | 17/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Granicusgranicus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Granicus | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Kahuakahua.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kahua | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| PermitTraxbitcosoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PermitTrax | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.