SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Polco

Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Polco does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from Polco on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Polco has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Polco does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Polco does notPolco publishes, and they do not
OpenGovopengov.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Submittablesubmittable.com 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Fluxxfluxx.io 43/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
ProudCityproudcity.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Foundantfoundant.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Granicusgranicus.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Accelaaccela.com 35/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Mark43mark43.com 30/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Rekorrekor.ai 30/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Axonaxon.com 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
ClearGovcleargov.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Euna Solutionseunasolutions.com 17/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.