Transparency alternatives to Rekor
Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Rekor. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 62 that differ from Rekor on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Rekor has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Rekor” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Rekor | Found at Rekor, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accelaaccela.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accela | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Submittablesubmittable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Submittable | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Fluxxfluxx.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Fluxx | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| OpenGovopengov.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenGov | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ProudCityproudcity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProudCity | 26/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Foundantfoundant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foundant | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| ARMSarms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ARMS | 17/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ClearGovcleargov.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClearGov | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Euna Solutionseunasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Euna Solutions | 17/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Granicusgranicus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Granicus | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Kahuakahua.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kahua | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| AquaResourcetecnxs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AquaResource | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.