SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Accela

Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Accela does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Accela on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Accela has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Accela does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Accela does notAccela publishes, and they do not
OpenGovopengov.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Fluxxfluxx.io 43/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Foundantfoundant.com 39/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Granicusgranicus.com 30/100 1 Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Mark43mark43.com 30/100 1 Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Rekorrekor.ai 30/100 1 Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Axonaxon.com 26/100 1 Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Euna Solutionseunasolutions.com 17/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Streamlinegetstreamline.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Neumoneumo.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Cataliscatalisgov.com 9/100 1 Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Clariticlariti.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.