SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Foundant

Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Foundant. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 62 that differ from Foundant on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Foundant has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Foundant” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at FoundantFound at Foundant, not found there
ProudCityproudcity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProudCity 26/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Accelaaccela.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accela 57/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Submittablesubmittable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Submittable 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare
OpenGovopengov.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenGov 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Fluxxfluxx.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Fluxx 43/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Rekorrekor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rekor 39/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
ARMSarms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ARMS 17/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Euna Solutionseunasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Euna Solutions 17/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
PermitTraxbitcosoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PermitTrax 17/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Streamlinegetstreamline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Streamline 17/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
AquaResourcetecnxs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AquaResource 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Clariticlariti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clariti 9/100 1 Public pricing 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.