SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Omada

Other Identity governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Omada does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 16 that differ from Omada on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Omada has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Omada does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Omada does notOmada publishes, and they do not
Hyprhypr.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Access Owlaccessowl.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Imprivataimprivata.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
Entitleentitle.io 35/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Beta Systemsbetasystems.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Clear Skyeclearskye.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Identityautomationidentityautomation.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ipgipg-group.com 23/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Stratastrata.io 22/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Optimal Idmoptimalidm.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Sonraisonraisecurity.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Atvantageatvantage.com 14/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.