Transparency alternatives to CyberloQ Secure
Other Password and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CyberloQ Secure does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from CyberloQ Secure on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
CyberloQ Secure has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and CyberloQ Secure does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and CyberloQ Secure does not | CyberloQ Secure publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keeperkeepersecurity.com | 74/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| Clerkclerk.com | 61/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Ping Identitypingidentity.com | 61/100 | 8 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Oktaokta.com | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| 1Password1password.com | 57/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Dashlanedashlane.com | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Duo Securityduo.com | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| WorkOSworkos.com | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Zitadelzitadel.com | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Oryory.com | 43/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Passboltpassbolt.com | 43/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| FusionAuthfusionauth.io | 39/100 | 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.