SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Keycloak

Other Password and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Keycloak does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Keycloak on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Keycloak has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Keycloak does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Keycloak does notKeycloak publishes, and they do not
Ping Identitypingidentity.com 74/100 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 nothing Compare
Keeperkeepersecurity.com 85/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
1Password1password.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Clerkclerk.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Oktaokta.com 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
WorkOSworkos.com 60/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Duo Securityduo.com 48/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Oryory.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Passboltpassbolt.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Descopedescope.com 39/100 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Fronteggfrontegg.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
FusionAuthfusionauth.io 39/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.