Alternatives to Uptime.com
Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Uptime.com does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Uptime.com on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Uptime.com has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Uptime.com does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Uptime.com does not | Uptime.com publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperpinghyperping.io | 74/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ilertilert.com | 70/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| incident.ioincident.io | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| OhDearohdear.app | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Moogsoftmoogsoft.com | 61/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| All Quietallquiet.app | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Causelycausely.ai | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| AlertOpsalertops.com | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rootlyrootly.com | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Everbridgeeverbridge.com | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Status.iostatus.io | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| BigPandabigpanda.io | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.