Alternatives to Eberl
Other Insurance software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Eberl does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Eberl on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Eberl has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Eberl does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Eberl does not | Eberl publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ezlynxezlynx.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Ivansivans.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Duck Creekduckcreek.com | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Guidewireguidewire.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Zegurozeguro.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Clearspeedclearspeed.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Crawfordcrawco.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Five Sigmafivesigmalabs.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Root Platformrootplatform.com | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Clarkclark.de | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| EIS Groupeisgroup.com | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Nowcertsnowcerts.com | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.