Transparency alternatives to Kirchhoff Consult
Other Investor relations and disclosure vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Kirchhoff Consult. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Kirchhoff Consult on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kirchhoff Consult has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Kirchhoff Consult” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Kirchhoff Consult | Found at Kirchhoff Consult, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broadridgebroadridge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Broadridge | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Quartrquartr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartr | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Toppan Merrilltoppanmerrill.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Toppan Merrill | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kingsdalekingsdaleadvisors.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kingsdale | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| DFINdfinsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DFIN | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| AlphaSensealpha-sense.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AlphaSense | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Irwingetirwin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Irwin | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Q4q4inc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Q4 | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sodali und Cosodali.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sodali und Co | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| D.F. Kingdfking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to D.F. King | 10/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Alliance Advisorsallianceadvisors.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alliance Advisors | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Computersharecomputershare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Computershare | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.