SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Irwin

Other Investor relations and disclosure vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Irwin does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Irwin on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Irwin has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Irwin does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Irwin does notIrwin publishes, and they do not
Broadridgebroadridge.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Sodali und Cosodali.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
ISS STOXXiss-stoxx.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kirchhoff Consultkirchhoff.de 13/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
AlphaSensealpha-sense.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Alliance Advisorsallianceadvisors.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
DFINdfinsolutions.com 17/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Kingsdalekingsdaleadvisors.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Quartrquartr.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
NetRoadshownetroadshow.com 10/100 1 Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
MZ Groupmzgroup.us 5/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
D.F. Kingdfking.com 10/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.