Transparency alternatives to IPzen
Other Patent and trademark management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at IPzen. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from IPzen on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
IPzen has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at IPzen” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at IPzen | Found at IPzen, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PatSnappatsnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatSnap | 52/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Doppeldoppel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doppel | 50/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| IPRallyiprally.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IPRally | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| PatentBotspatentbots.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatentBots | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Wellspringwellspring.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wellspring | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Amplifiedamplified.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Amplified | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| TechInsightstechinsights.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TechInsights | 32/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Corsearchcorsearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Corsearch | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| EBRANDebrand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EBRAND | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Questelquestel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Questel | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Inteuminteum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Inteum | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Nameshieldnameshield.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nameshield | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.