SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Matrix42

Other IT service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Matrix42 does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Matrix42 on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Matrix42 has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Matrix42 does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Matrix42 does notMatrix42 publishes, and they do not
Atlassianatlassian.com 78/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Rezolverezolve.ai 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
HaloITSMhaloitsm.com 60/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Atomicworkatomicwork.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Siitsiit.io 50/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Vivantiovivantio.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ciresoncireson.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Xurrentxurrent.com 42/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Issuetrakissuetrak.com 40/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ivantiivanti.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
OTRSotrs.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Alloy Softwarealloysoftware.com 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.