SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to CosmoLex

Other Legal practice management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at CosmoLex. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 47 that differ from CosmoLex on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CosmoLex has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at CosmoLex” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at CosmoLexFound at CosmoLex, not found there
Luminanceluminance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Luminance 65/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 1 Public pricing Compare
Cerenadecerenade.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cerenade 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Amberloamberlo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Amberlo 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Litifylitify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Litify 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Smokeballsmokeball.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smokeball 35/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Aderantaderant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aderant 30/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
MyCasemycase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MyCase 30/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Eliteelite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elite 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Assembly Neosassemblysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assembly Neos 35/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Filevinefilevine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Filevine 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Definelydefinely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Definely 26/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Josefjoseflegal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Josef 26/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.