Transparency alternatives to Filevine
Other Legal practice management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Filevine. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 49 that differ from Filevine on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Filevine has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Filevine” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Filevine | Found at Filevine, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luminanceluminance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Luminance | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Litifylitify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Litify | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| MyCasemycase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MyCase | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Cerenadecerenade.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cerenade | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Amberloamberlo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Amberlo | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Assembly Neosassemblysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assembly Neos | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Smokeballsmokeball.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smokeball | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Eliteelite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elite | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Tabs3tabs3.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tabs3 | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| StrongSuitstrongsuit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to StrongSuit | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Dexcodexco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dexco | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Easysofteasysoft-usa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easysoft | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.