SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Improvado

Other Marketing attribution vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Improvado does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Improvado on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Improvado has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Improvado does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Improvado does notImprovado publishes, and they do not
Cometlycometly.com 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Analyzifyanalyzify.com 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Factors.aifactors.ai 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Northbeamnorthbeam.io 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
HockeyStackhockeystack.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Tealiumtealium.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
DashThisdashthis.com 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Funnelfunnel.io 43/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
BlueConicblueconic.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Elevargetelevar.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Addingwelladdingwell.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Adverityadverity.com 35/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.