SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to CGM

Other Medical practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at CGM. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 85 that differ from CGM on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CGM has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at CGM” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at CGMFound at CGM, not found there
Nookalnookal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nookal 78/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Heidi Healthheidihealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Heidi Health 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Clinikocliniko.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cliniko 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Semblesemble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Semble 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Teleclinicteleclinic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teleclinic 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Function 365function365.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Function 365 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Clinicmasterclinicmaster.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clinicmaster 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Doctenadoctena.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doctena 35/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
NextGennextgen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NextGen 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Mira Healthmirahealth.careSee also Transparency alternatives to Mira Health 26/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
SimplePracticesimplepractice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplePractice 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
4D EMR4d-emr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 4D EMR 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.