SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Mira Health

Other Medical practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mira Health. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 88 that differ from Mira Health on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Mira Health has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Mira Health” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Mira HealthFound at Mira Health, not found there
Nookalnookal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nookal 78/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Heidi Healthheidihealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Heidi Health 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Clinikocliniko.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cliniko 43/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Semblesemble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Semble 39/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Doctenadoctena.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doctena 35/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Teleclinicteleclinic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teleclinic 35/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
SimplePracticesimplepractice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplePractice 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
4D EMR4d-emr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 4D EMR 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Doctolibdoctolib.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Doctolib 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Duriaduria.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Duria 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Quincyfrey.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Quincy 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
DAMPSOFTdampsoft.deSee also Transparency alternatives to DAMPSOFT 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.