SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Lightning AI

Other MLOps and model serving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Lightning AI. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 34 that differ from Lightning AI on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Lightning AI has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Lightning AI” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Lightning AIFound at Lightning AI, not found there
H2O.aih2o.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to H2O.ai 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
RunPodrunpod.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to RunPod 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Superwisesuperwise.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Superwise 65/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Anyscaleanyscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anyscale 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Nscalenscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nscale 52/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Vast.aivast.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vast.ai 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Nebiusnebius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nebius 43/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Unionunion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Union 39/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Dataikudataiku.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dataiku 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 Compare
Basetenbaseten.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Baseten 43/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Paperspacepaperspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paperspace 43/100 1 Certifications named 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Modalmodal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modal 39/100 1 Data processing agreement 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.