Alternatives to Together AI
Other MLOps and model serving vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Together AI does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Together AI on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Together AI has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Together AI does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Together AI does not | Together AI publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anyscaleanyscale.com | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Basetenbaseten.co | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Paperspacepaperspace.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| H2O.aih2o.ai | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Nscalenscale.com | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DataRobotdatarobot.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Modalmodal.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CoreWeavecoreweave.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| BentoMLbentoml.com | 32/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cometcomet.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Nebiusnebius.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Northern Datanortherndata.de | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.