Transparency alternatives to Together AI
Other MLOps and model serving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Together AI. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Together AI on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Together AI has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Together AI” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Together AI | Found at Together AI, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superwisesuperwise.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Superwise | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Nscalenscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nscale | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Basetenbaseten.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Baseten | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| RunPodrunpod.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to RunPod | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Vast.aivast.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vast.ai | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| H2O.aih2o.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to H2O.ai | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Paperspacepaperspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paperspace | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Unionunion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Union | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Modalmodal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modal | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CoreWeavecoreweave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CoreWeave | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| BentoMLbentoml.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BentoML | 32/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cometcomet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Comet | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.