SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Virtuous

Other Nonprofit fundraising vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Virtuous. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from Virtuous on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Virtuous has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Virtuous” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at VirtuousFound at Virtuous, not found there
Handbidhandbid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Handbid 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Beaconbeaconcrm.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Beacon 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Donorfydonorfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorfy 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Donorboxdonorbox.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorbox 39/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Funraisefunraise.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Funraise 39/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
VerticalChangeverticalchange.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VerticalChange 39/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Givebuttergivebutter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Givebutter 30/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Neon Oneneonone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Neon One 30/100 1 Data location stated 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
OneCauseonecause.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OneCause 30/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Snowballsnowballfundraising.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Snowball 26/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
JustGivingjustgiving.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JustGiving 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
GRÜN Softwaregruen.netSee also Transparency alternatives to GRÜN Software 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.