SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to JustGiving

Other Nonprofit fundraising vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at JustGiving. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from JustGiving on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

JustGiving has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at JustGiving” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at JustGivingFound at JustGiving, not found there
Beaconbeaconcrm.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Beacon 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Handbidhandbid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Handbid 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Donorfydonorfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorfy 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Donorboxdonorbox.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorbox 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Blackbaudblackbaud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Blackbaud 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Funraisefunraise.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Funraise 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
VerticalChangeverticalchange.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VerticalChange 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Bloomerangbloomerang.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomerang 30/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Keelakeela.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Keela 30/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Neon Oneneonone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Neon One 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Wikandowikando.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Wikando 10/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Givebuttergivebutter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Givebutter 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.