SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Culture Exploit

Other Performance management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Culture Exploit does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 40 that differ from Culture Exploit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Culture Exploit has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Culture Exploit does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Culture Exploit does notCulture Exploit publishes, and they do not
PerformYardperformyard.com 71/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Betterworksbetterworks.com 65/100 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Latticelattice.com 57/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
Perdooperdoo.com 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Profit.coprofit.co 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
WorkBoardworkboard.com 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Leapsomeleapsome.com 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Culture Ampcultureamp.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Kudoskudos.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Nectarnectarhr.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Small Improvementssmall-improvements.com 43/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Zensaizensai.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.