Transparency alternatives to Perdoo
Other Performance management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Perdoo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Perdoo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Perdoo has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Perdoo” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Perdoo | Found at Perdoo, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betterworksbetterworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Betterworks | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| PerformYardperformyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PerformYard | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Latticelattice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lattice | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| WorkBoardworkboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WorkBoard | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Leapsomeleapsome.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapsome | 61/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Profit.coprofit.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Profit.co | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Culture Ampcultureamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Culture Amp | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Kudoskudos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kudos | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Nectarnectarhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nectar | 48/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Zensaizensai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zensai | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Small Improvementssmall-improvements.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Small Improvements | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Assemblyjoinassembly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assembly | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.