Transparency alternatives to Small Improvements
Other Performance management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Small Improvements. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Small Improvements on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Small Improvements has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Small Improvements” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Small Improvements | Found at Small Improvements, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betterworksbetterworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Betterworks | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| PerformYardperformyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PerformYard | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Leapsomeleapsome.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapsome | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Perdooperdoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Perdoo | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Latticelattice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lattice | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Profit.coprofit.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Profit.co | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Nectarnectarhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nectar | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| WorkBoardworkboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WorkBoard | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Culture Ampcultureamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Culture Amp | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Zensaizensai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zensai | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kudoskudos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kudos | 48/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| 15Five15five.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 15Five | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.