SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Compleat Software

Other Procurement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Compleat Software does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 39 that differ from Compleat Software on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Compleat Software has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Compleat Software does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Compleat Software does notCompleat Software publishes, and they do not
Keelvarkeelvar.com 70/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Procurifyprocurify.com 52/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Mediusmedius.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Onventisonventis.com 48/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Zipziphq.com 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Yordexyordex.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Ivaluaivalua.com 33/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Turbineturbinehq.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Precoroprecoro.com 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Pactumpactum.com 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Archletarchlet.io 22/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Baswarebasware.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.