Transparency alternatives to Airtable
Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Airtable. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 76 that differ from Airtable on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Airtable has 1 gap in what we could measure: No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Airtable” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Airtable | Found at Airtable, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linearlinear.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Linear | 70/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Stackfieldstackfield.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stackfield | 52/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Niftyniftypm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nifty | 43/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Superthreadsuperthread.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Superthread | 30/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Taigataiga.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Taiga | 26/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| PDWarepdware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PDWare | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | Compare |
| Switswit.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Swit | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 10 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +7 | Compare |
| Flow Officeflow-office.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Flow Office | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 11 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +8 | Compare |
| Smartsheetsmartsheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartsheet | 91/100 | nothing we found there and not here | nothing | Compare |
| Miromiro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Miro | 70/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Oraora.pmSee also Transparency alternatives to Ora | 70/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Plutioplutio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plutio | 70/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.