SaaS Ranking

Swit

swit.io · Project management · checked 2026-09-14

17/100FBand F

Rank 48 of 70 in Project management, where the median is 22.

We measured 12 of 12 criteria for Swit on 2026-09-14. We found 2 with a source and did not find 10 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 17 out of 100, band F.

Overview

1 day since the newest finding, 1 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria measured in the last 30 days.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Swit

swit.io · Project management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
F 17of 100 Rank 48 of 70

Published commitments1 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-14. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Swit has no such document.

Where Swit sits in Project management

  1. A2 3%
  2. B3 4%
  3. C5 7%
  4. D7 10%
  5. E14 20%
  6. F39 56%
70 vendors with a score; 2 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Swit is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

Gaps, heaviest first

Data processing agreement

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://swit.io/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://swit.io/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://swit.io/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://swit.io/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://swit.io/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://swit.io/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://swit.io/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  8. https://swit.io/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Subprocessor list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://swit.io/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://swit.io/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://swit.io/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://swit.io/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://swit.io/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://swit.io/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://swit.io/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Data location stated

weight 3 of 3

No statement about data location found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://swit.io/security – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://swit.io/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://swit.io/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://swit.io/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://swit.io/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://swit.io/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://swit.io/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Status page with history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.swit.io/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://swit.io/status – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://swit.io.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

No enforced HTTPS with HSTS found.

Checked 2 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 2 addresses we checked
  1. http://swit.io/ – redirects to https://swit.io:443/
  2. https://swit.io/ – no HSTS header

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://swit.io/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://swit.io/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://swit.io/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://swit.io/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://swit.io/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://swit.io/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://swit.io/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  8. https://swit.io/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Certifications named

weight 1 of 3

No named certification found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://swit.io/security – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://swit.io/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://swit.io/trust-center – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://swit.io/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://swit.io/legal/security – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://trust.swit.io/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://swit.io/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://swit.io/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://swit.io/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://swit.io/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://swit.io/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://swit.io/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-14.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://swit.io/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Named privacy contact

weight 1 of 3

No named privacy contact found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-14.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://swit.io/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://swit.io/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://swit.io/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://swit.io/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://swit.io/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://swit.io/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://swit.io/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 2

Public pricing

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://swit.io/pricing · checked 2026-09-14

No third-party tracking before consent

weight 2 of 3

No third-party requests before any interaction.

Source: https://swit.io/ · checked 2026-09-14

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.