Alternatives to Nifty
Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Nifty does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Nifty on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Nifty has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Nifty does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Nifty does not | Nifty publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airtableairtable.com | 91/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Smartsheetsmartsheet.com | 91/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Miromiro.com | 74/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Linearlinear.app | 80/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| OpenProjectopenproject.org | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Teamworkteamwork.com | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| monday.commonday.com | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ClickUpclickup.com | 56/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Trellotrello.com | 55/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Asanaasana.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hivehive.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Basecampbasecamp.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.