SaaS Ranking
Menu

Miro: what they publish

miro.com · Project management · checked 2026-10-18

70/100BBand B

Rank 4 of 78 in Project management, where the median is 24.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-18. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

1 day since the newest dated result, 1 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Miro

miro.com · Project management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
B 70of 100 Rank 4 of 78

Published commitments7 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-18. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Miro has no such document.

Where Miro sits in Project management

  1. A2 3%
  2. B4 5%
  3. C6 8%
  4. D9 12%
  5. E18 23%
  6. F39 50%
78 vendors with a score; 3 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Miro is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Miro states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://trust.miro.com/ · checked 2026-10-18

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://miro.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://miro.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://miro.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://miro.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://miro.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://miro.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://miro.com/trust/dpa – found, but behind a sign-in
  8. https://miro.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Project management: 13 of 78 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-18.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://miro.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: cdn.cookielaw.org, cdn.jsdelivr.net, events.framer.com, fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com, framerusercontent.com, geolocation.onetrust.com, i.ytimg.com, images.ctfassets.net, mirostatic.com, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Project management: 9 of 79 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-18.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://miro.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Project management: 16 of 74 companies

✗

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://miro.com/legal/privacy-policy/ · checked 2026-10-18

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://miro.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://miro.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://miro.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://miro.com/legal/privacy-policy – found, but behind a sign-in
  5. https://miro.com/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://miro.com/trust/privacy – found, but behind a sign-in
  7. https://miro.com/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Project management: 26 of 79 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 8
✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://trust.miro.com/ · checked 2026-10-18

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Project management: 12 of 77 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording Japan, United States. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    · United States* (data residency available for AUS, EU, US, Japan) Infrastructure United States* (data residency available for AUS, EU, US, Japan) Anthropic · United

    Read at https://trust.miro.com/

    · United States* (data residency available for AUS, EU, US, Japan) Infrastructure United States* (data residency available for AUS,

    Read at https://trust.miro.com/

Source: https://trust.miro.com/ · checked 2026-10-18

Across the market: Data location stated in Project management: 31 of 79 companies

✓

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.miro.com/ · checked 2026-10-18

Across the market: Status page with history in Project management: 13 of 77 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://miro.com/pricing/ · checked 2026-10-18

Across the market: Public pricing in Project management: 57 of 78 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Read at https://miro.com/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains.
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Read at https://miro.com/

Source: https://miro.com/ · checked 2026-10-18

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Project management: 50 of 80 companies

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

Source: https://trust.miro.com/ · checked 2026-10-18

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Project management: 13 of 78 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page Cyber Essentials (unclear from the sentence), ISO 22301 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 Type II (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 5 exact wordings

    Cyber Essentials certification Certification to the UK government-backed scheme shows foundational cyber hygiene mea

    Read at https://trust.miro.com/

    remedies, demonstrating confidence in operational resilience Business continuity framework based on ISO 22301 The business continuity program encompasses planning, monitoring, regular testing, and con...

    Read at https://trust.miro.com/

    Miro Trust Center - ISO 42001, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II | Powered by Wolfia Miro Trust Center Welcome to Miro's Trust Center, where our

    Read at https://trust.miro.com/

    Is Miro SOC 2 compliant?

    Read at https://trust.miro.com/

    Miro Trust Center - ISO 42001, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II | Powered by Wolfia Miro Trust Center Welcome to Miro's Trust Center, where our commit

    Read at https://trust.miro.com/

Source: https://trust.miro.com/ · checked 2026-10-18

Across the market: Certifications named in Project management: 30 of 78 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99.5 %.
    Show the exact wording

    ndary cloud regions so that services can be restored even if a primary location becomes unavailable 99.5 % uptime service-level agreement Contractual SLA commits to high availability and includes fina...

    Read at https://trust.miro.com/

Source: https://trust.miro.com/ · checked 2026-10-18

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Project management: 5 of 77 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-11: 70 of 1002026-10-18: 70 of 100 2026-10-11 2026-10-18
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Miro in: 70 (2026-10-11), 70 (2026-10-18).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Miro

8 found · 4 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-18.

Investigate 4 open evidence questions
  1. Data processing agreement

    Please share the current data processing agreement for the product and plan we are considering, including its annexes and signing process.

    Inspect this check
  2. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  3. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  4. Named privacy contact

    Which privacy contact handles requests for our account, and what escalation path should we use?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.