SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Ideagen

Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ideagen. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 84 that differ from Ideagen on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ideagen has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Ideagen” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at IdeagenFound at Ideagen, not found there
Ketryxketryx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ketryx 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Qualioqualio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qualio 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
AM System Classicamsystem.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AM System Classic 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Propelpropelsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propel 35/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Arenaarenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arena 26/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
SimplerQMSsimplerqms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplerQMS 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Cognidoxcognidox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognidox 39/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
myoshmyosh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to myosh 39/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Certainty Softwarecertaintysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Certainty Software 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Grand Avenue Softwaregrandavenue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Grand Avenue Software 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
SoftComplysoftcomply.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SoftComply 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Durodurolabs.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Duro 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.