Transparency alternatives to Isolocity
Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Isolocity. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from Isolocity on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Isolocity has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Isolocity” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Isolocity | Found at Isolocity, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SimplerQMSsimplerqms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplerQMS | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Ketryxketryx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ketryx | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Qualioqualio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qualio | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Castor EDCcastoredc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Castor EDC | 17/100 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| AM System Classicamsystem.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AM System Classic | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Cognidoxcognidox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognidox | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| myoshmyosh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to myosh | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Grand Avenue Softwaregrandavenue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Grand Avenue Software | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Propelpropelsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propel | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| TrackWisespartasystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrackWise | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Arenaarenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arena | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| SoftComplysoftcomply.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SoftComply | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.