SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Workvivo

Other Retail operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Workvivo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Workvivo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Workvivo has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Workvivo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Workvivo does notWorkvivo publishes, and they do not
Firstupfirstup.io 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Repslyrepsly.com 65/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 Status page with history Compare
Axeroaxerosolutions.com 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 1 Status page with history Compare
MangoAppsmangoapps.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Iglooigloosoftware.com 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Happeohappeo.com 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
YOOBICyoobic.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Blinkjoinblink.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Haiilohaiilo.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Interactinteractsoftware.com 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Flipgetflip.com 30/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Jostlejostle.me 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.