Transparency alternatives to One Step GPS
Other Route planning and delivery vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at One Step GPS. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 64 that differ from One Step GPS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
One Step GPS has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at One Step GPS” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at One Step GPS | Found at One Step GPS, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RideCorideco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RideCo | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| NextBillion.ainextbillion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to NextBillion.ai | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Navixynavixy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navixy | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Lytxlytx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lytx | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Netradynenetradyne.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netradyne | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Routalroutal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Routal | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Detrackdetrack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Detrack | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Nautonauto.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nauto | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| FTS GPSftsgps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FTS GPS | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Avriosavrios.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avrios | 30/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Routificroutific.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Routific | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TripShottripshot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TripShot | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.