SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to One Step GPS

Other Route planning and delivery vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that One Step GPS does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 65 that differ from One Step GPS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

One Step GPS has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and One Step GPS does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and One Step GPS does notOne Step GPS publishes, and they do not
RideCorideco.com 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
NextBillion.ainextbillion.ai 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Navixynavixy.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Lytxlytx.com 48/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Tookanjungleworks.com 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Netradynenetradyne.com 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Routalroutal.com 43/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
FTS GPSftsgps.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Nautonauto.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Badger Mapsbadgermapping.com 43/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Routificroutific.com 39/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Avriosavrios.com 30/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.